Vade Mecum

A few months ago, in a post on medical manuscripts, I wrote about vade mecum and lamented that I couldn’t find any images online.  Reader Margie has come to the rescue with a great list of examples, and I’ve collected and annotated some of the images below.  Thanks Margie!

Vade mecum were carried by variety of professions, especially the mendicant religious orders, and not all included medical information.  Though the Welcome and UCLA examples below include medical diagrams, some of the others seem to be purely calendrical in nature.

Wellcome MS 40

This example was made in the late fifteenth-century.  Here we see the outer appearance of the vade mecum, including the folded pieces of parchment that make up the booklet and the two individual pieces that cover the front and back as a form of loose binding.

A calendar page fully opened from the front and displaying two months.  You can see the four folds that create the booklet – one horizontal and three vertical.  At the bottom the binding is visible.

A calendar page fully opened from the back.  On the lower half is the table of contents listing the three months written on this page.  When folded, the calendars are hidden and only the table of contents is visible while flipping through the almanac.

A zodiac man, with descriptions of each sign.

A phlebotomy, or bloodletting, man, showing the points to cut, as well as astrological charts.

Berkeley Huntington Library HM 47641 (please see correction in the comments below.  Thanks Justin!)

This example, from the Huntington Library at Berkeley, is unusual in that it has a brass cover.  It’s possible that other vade mecum had similar covers of metal or leather which have been lost.

The Berkeley manuscript opened – this liturgical calender has a different, and less commonly seen, orientation than the Welcome manuscript above.

Royal Observatory Edinburgh (scroll down)

This is a great photo, showing exactly how the booklets were opened and consulted.

Schoyen Collection (see MS 1581 and MS 2913)

MS in Norwegian and Latin on vellum, Uvdal, Norway, 1636, 30 ff. (complete), 5,5×5,5 cm, single column, (5×5 cm), 15 lines in capitals, Norwegian Gothic cursive script and a variant of Roman numbers, 80 miniatures of saints or their symbols, 12 circular diagrams, 12 miniatures of the occupations of the months, all in full colours; the book flattens out into a long strip, 67×11 cm, each section cut and folded around each month.

Binding: Norway, 1636, not bound but plied together to form a book, in its original girdle type leather covered wooden box.

Context: Very similar to 2 Norwegian girdle calendars dated 1558: the Hegra Calendar in Trondheim, Det Kgl. Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Bibliotek, and the Oslo Calendar, cf. MS 1581. Layout and illustrations are nearly identical, but the two earlier calendars are rather crudely executed compared to the present one.

This Norwegian almanac is very interesting in that it was created in 1636, long after the establishment of printing throughout Europe.  It would be interesting to learn more about manuscript calender production in this period, and why this format might have been chosen over printed calenders in this region.

More examples from the Bodleian Library and UCLA:

Bodleian MS Rawl. D. 939

Bodleian MS Ashmole 8

Bodleian Canon. Liturg. 237

Bodleian MS Rawl. D. 28

UCLA MS Rosenbach 1004/29 – Two medical images – a bloodletting man and a urine wheel (used to diagnose based on the color and texture of a patient’s urine).

Irony

The world’s largest collection of sixteenth-century anatomical prints, or ‘fugitive sheets’ has been digitized and is available online, thanks to the Wellcome Library.  There are nineteen prints with pop-up action allowing the reader to see different organ systems in the order of dissection.  In this male and female set you can see both still images and video of the flaps being lifted—brilliant!  (I do wish that more of the entries offered stills, since the video is cool but it’s hard to get a detailed view of the different layers.)

I’m in the process of looking through all these, but I’m especially intrigued by this one.  Can you guess who’s making an unauthorized celebrity cameo?  It’s Vesalius’s head on that body, copied from his full-page portrait in the Fabrica.  Right next to an organ (on the right) taken from the same book.  Vesalius spent a great deal of energy, even prior to publication, in trying to forestall the plagiarism of his work.  I doubt, though, that even he imagined his own head would end up on a perpetually-being-dissected body.  One has to wonder about the motives of the artist—an ironic joke at the great dissector’s expense?

Here’s the original portrait for comparison:

What’s Your Sign?

I know that I’ve been quiet lately, but it’s because my last set of essays was due in early June and since then I’ve been working intently on my dissertation.  I’m studying the Gildbook of the Barber-Surgeons of York, held at the British Library, and have been reading about medieval medicine and the types of books consulted by medieval practitioners.

Medicine during the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Era was practiced by a wide variety of people.  Most illnesses were treated at home by the women of the household or by members of the community with herbal and folk knowledge.  Barbers and surgeons were skilled laborers who undertook more complex treatments, notably cutting for cataract, surgically removing anal fistulas and cancers, repairing broken bones and disjointed limbs, trepanation for head injuries, treatment of venereal diseases, and leechcraft (bleeding).  At the highest level of medical care was the physicus, usually university-educated and Latinate, urban, and less likely to preform surgical procedures, which were considered undignified manual work.  Though these seem like hard and fast categories, dividing lines were actually blurry and many similarities are found between the groups.  Sources shows that educated physicians used folk knowledge and herbal remedies, and ‘uneducated’ barbers often owned and consulted books in Latin and other languages.  As skilled tradesmen, barbers and surgeons often formed guilds to regulate their trade and to promote education through apprenticeship.  The York guild was one of the most prominent outside of London and has left us excellent records of its activity.

Some of the most important books used by medical practitioners were those containing charts to assist in treatment.  Late medieval medicine was based on theories inherited from the ancient world that were filtered through classical thinkers such as Galen, preserved and annotated by Islamic scholars, and reintroduced to Europe in the thirteenth century.  Astrology was the most important of these, and while it influenced many aspects of medieval life it was most strongly tied to medicine.  It was a system in which humans were intimately tied to the movements of the cosmos, and an individual’s horoscope determined the ratio of humours that created his or her personality and body type.  Movements in the heavens (in addition to an individual’s age, sex, and behavior) could lead to humoral imbalances, and potential treatments had to be scrutinized to assure that the stars were aligned favorably.  A good example is bleeding: it was clear that the Moon affected tides, and was also believed to affect the ebb and flow of humours in the body.  If the Moon was located in the sign that corresponded to a specific body part then that member should not be bled, or the patient might die from the loss of humours.  Practicing astrology, though, was incredibly complex, so doctors developed helpful charts to assist in diagnosis and treatment.  The popular ‘Zodiac Man’ illustrated the signs that governed different parts of the body, while charts called volvelles used movable discs to determine favorable conditions for treatment.

The Gildbook of the Barber-Surgeons of York, which includes a variety of common medical charts, was begun in the 1480s and added to until the end of the eighteenth century.  Primarily a ceremonial text rather than one consulted on a daily basis, it is mostly in English and contains the gild’s ordinances and oath, portraits of monarchs, a liturgical calendar, and medical illustrations and texts.  (Click for bigger images.)

Page from the liturgical calendar for September.  The entries in red are feast days in honor of saints, which is where the term ‘red letter day’ originated.  Many of the red days celebrate saints associated with northern England or medicine.

The head of Christ and personifications of the four humours, clockwise from top left: melancholy man, sanguine man, phlegmatic man, and choleric man.

Vein Man: explanation of bleeding points, most of which are located on the arms and face.  These delicate illustrations are influenced by Flemish artwork of the period, possibly transmitted via trade links of the city of York, which was an important mercantile center.

Zodiac Man.  Pretty self-explanatory.  I’m enamoured of the lovely goat illustration for capricorn.  And amused by scorpio, which I’ve noticed is usually drawn as a multi-legged dragonish sort of creature.

The Volvelle.  The pointer determines the sun sign, and the piece that would determine the moon sign is missing.  The figures at the top are Saints John the Baptist and John the Evangelist, and below are Saints Cosmas and Damian, all traditional patron saints for medieval barbers and surgeons.  Cosmas is holding the ubiquitous symbol of medieval medicine, the urine flask, and Damian prepares medicine.

In addition to the Gildbook I’m looking at a variety of other medieval medical texts.  Some of my favorites are small handbooks called vade mecum, which means ‘bring me along.’  These were small pieces of parchment folded and sewn together at the bottom and attached to the belt or slipped into a pocket for quick reference.  They contained calenders and medical charts like the ones above, only in miniature.  I spent a delightful afternoon with six vade mecum in the British Library last week, and was pleased to see and feel the wear indicative of frequent use, not unlike my own notebook.  Sadly, there aren’t many digital versions of these texts, probably because they’re a bitch to unfold and photograph.  Below is an image from British Library MS Egerton 2724.  This image is part of a faded calendar showing activities for different months.  This specific text is unusual compared to the others I’ve looked at, being square rather than rectangular and using a different folding system.  I wish there were some others online I could show you, because I’ve seen some very beautiful examples.

Next week I’ll take a look at a few more interesting medical manuscripts, but now it’s time for bed.  I have to get up early tomorrow because I’m leaving for York to do research in the city archives.  Looking forward to exploring the city walls and cathedral, and I’ll be sure to twitter all sorts of useless things during my trip.

Memento Mori Part II

A few weeks ago I wrote about the evolution of anatomy illustrations, promising that the second part of the series would appear the following week.  If you’ve been waiting, I apologize, but I have a good excuse—Scientific American contacted me about doing a similar slideshow for their website, which has just gone live.  Very exciting!  There are ten images, a couple are based on my previous post, but most completely new: check it out.

Making Visible Embryos

The Cambridge University Department of the History and Philosophy of Science has created an absolutely wonderful online exhibition called Making Visible Embryos.  It looks at changing perceptions and imagery regarding human prenatal development from the late Middle Ages to the present, and includes illustrations from a number of interesting, early modern printed works.  The exhibit is extensive – make sure you go through both layers of tabs to get all the good stuff.

Teeth

Shakespeare Teeth

  • Image courtesy of the University of Michigan Dentistry Library

Having my wisdom teeth removed is a procedure I’ve been putting off for, well, years at this point. So when my jaw started aching this week I didn’t pick up the phone to make an appointment with the oral surgeon. I got online and looked up the history of dental books.

One of the first things I found was a great Flickr collection by rosefirerising from the University of Michigan Dentistry Library.   Tons of stuff, including books, journal articles, anatomical illustrations, cartoons, ephemera and antique dental instruments.  Some of my favorite pictures are in the set called “Dentistry – Women and Children First.”  The one above is fantastic; who knew teeth wore tiny boots. 

Brushing, U of Michigan dentistry Library

  • Image courtesy of the University of Michigan Dentistry Library

Additionally, the American and British Dental Associations have history websites that list major works on dentistry.  I’ve compiled some of the most interesting below.

 - Artzney Buchlein (Little Medicinal Book for all Kinds of Diseases and Infirmities of the Teeth,) the first book “devoted entirely to dentistry,” was published in Germany in 1530.  Image courtesy of the University of Michigan Dentistry Library.

Artzney Buchlein

 - Libellus de dentibus (A Little Treatise on the Teeth) by Bartholomew Eusttachius, was published in 1563.

Eustachio’s contributions to the development of dental science were substantial. In addition to the many conceptual advances concerning tooth development and function, based on anatomical dissections, he also presented more detailed plates of the musculature of the face, floor of the mouth and neck as well as detailed plates of the tongue and of the crown and roots of the teeth. – Dental Classics in Perspective, Volume 2, 1999

 - “1575—In France Ambrose Pare, known as the Father of Surgery, publishes his Complete Works. This includes practical information about dentistry such as tooth extraction and the treatment of tooth decay and jaw fractures,” (ADA).

 - The first dental book in English, The Operator for the Teeth by Charles Allen, was published in 1685.

 - In 1723 French surgeon Pierre Fauchard published Le Chirurgien Dentiste (The Surgeon Dentist, A Treatise on Teeth).

Fauchard is credited as being the Father of Modern Dentistry because his book was the first to describe a comprehensive system for the practice of dentistry including basic oral anatomy and function, operative and restorative techniques, and denture construction (ADA).

 - The Natural History of the Human Teeth was published by John Hunter in 1771, followed by A Practical Treatise on Diseases of the Teeth in 1778.

These works revolutionised the practice of dentistry and provided a basis for later dental research. The natural history of human teeth is a detailed study of the mouth, jaws and teeth. Its plates are exceptionally clear and accurate (King’s College London, ISS).

 - In 1890 Willoughby Miller publishes Micro-Organisms of the Human Mouth, utilizing the germ theory to explain tooth decay. “This generates an unprecedented interest in oral hygiene and starts a world-wide movement to promote regular toothbrushing and flossing,” (ADA).  The picture below is the Human Mouth as a Focus of Infection, Plate 3, courtesy of the University of Michigan Dentistry Library.

Micro-Organisms of the Human Mouth

Dream Anatomy

The Winter edition of the SHARP newsletter features a review of a recent exhibit at the National Library of Medicine called Do Mandrakes Really Scream? Magic and Medicine in Harry Potter. The exhibit was designed for children and isn’t very substantive, but it does have some cool images. Overall a pretty creative way to interest kids in history and rare books. I know my ten-year-old self would have been completely enthralled, even without the Harry Potter connection.

  • Mandrake from the Hortus sanitatis, Mainz, 1491, hosted by the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Mandrake - Hortus sanitatis

I spent some time looking around the Library of Medicine’s other online exhibitions and was really intrigued by Dream Anatomy. A detailed look at anatomy texts over the centuries, it begins with an explanation of the various technologies used to reproduce anatomical images in books, a thoughtful addition that could have been easily overlooked.

The body of the exhibit covers texts from the mid 15th century up to the Visible Human project of the 1990s, analyzing the intellectual milieus in which the works were created and connecting the images to science and technology, philosophy, religion and fine art. The exhibit also discusses how the presentation of human anatomy changed over time, from fanciful, dramatic and sometimes humorous to more “scientific” and dispassionate.

  • Copperplate engraving by John Browne, London, 1681. Hosted by the National Library of Medicine.

John Brown Anatomical Image

“Browne’s figures dance and posture with theatrical gestures. Here a seductive coquette flirtatiously displays her musculature.”

I was particularly interested in the page on the Modernist work of Fritz Kahn, who combined images of the organic body with those of technology. I would love to have Der Mensch als Industriepalast (Man as Industrial Palace), below, on my wall. (I think a visit to ABE is in order to get some of his books.)

  • Chromolithograph by Fritz Kahn , Stuttgart, Germany, 1926. Hosted by the National Library of Medicine.

Der Mensch als Industriepalast

“Kahn’s modernist visualization of the digestive and respiratory system as “industrial palace,” really a chemical plant, was conceived in a period when the German chemical industry was the world’s most advanced.”

The Library has a number of other online exhibits featuring subjects like Arabic manuscripts, medical ephemera, Frankenstein, and the horse in medicine. The only real criticism I could make is that each exhibit is organized differently and some are difficult to navigate or less user-friendly than I would like. But I definitely recommend that, unless you’re quite squeamish, you check out Dream Anatomy.