Vade Mecum

A few months ago, in a post on medical manuscripts, I wrote about vade mecum and lamented that I couldn’t find any images online.  Reader Margie has come to the rescue with a great list of examples, and I’ve collected and annotated some of the images below.  Thanks Margie!

Vade mecum were carried by variety of professions, especially the mendicant religious orders, and not all included medical information.  Though the Welcome and UCLA examples below include medical diagrams, some of the others seem to be purely calendrical in nature.

Wellcome MS 40

This example was made in the late fifteenth-century.  Here we see the outer appearance of the vade mecum, including the folded pieces of parchment that make up the booklet and the two individual pieces that cover the front and back as a form of loose binding.

A calendar page fully opened from the front and displaying two months.  You can see the four folds that create the booklet – one horizontal and three vertical.  At the bottom the binding is visible.

A calendar page fully opened from the back.  On the lower half is the table of contents listing the three months written on this page.  When folded, the calendars are hidden and only the table of contents is visible while flipping through the almanac.

A zodiac man, with descriptions of each sign.

A phlebotomy, or bloodletting, man, showing the points to cut, as well as astrological charts.

Berkeley Huntington Library HM 47641 (please see correction in the comments below.  Thanks Justin!)

This example, from the Huntington Library at Berkeley, is unusual in that it has a brass cover.  It’s possible that other vade mecum had similar covers of metal or leather which have been lost.

The Berkeley manuscript opened – this liturgical calender has a different, and less commonly seen, orientation than the Welcome manuscript above.

Royal Observatory Edinburgh (scroll down)

This is a great photo, showing exactly how the booklets were opened and consulted.

Schoyen Collection (see MS 1581 and MS 2913)

MS in Norwegian and Latin on vellum, Uvdal, Norway, 1636, 30 ff. (complete), 5,5×5,5 cm, single column, (5×5 cm), 15 lines in capitals, Norwegian Gothic cursive script and a variant of Roman numbers, 80 miniatures of saints or their symbols, 12 circular diagrams, 12 miniatures of the occupations of the months, all in full colours; the book flattens out into a long strip, 67×11 cm, each section cut and folded around each month.

Binding: Norway, 1636, not bound but plied together to form a book, in its original girdle type leather covered wooden box.

Context: Very similar to 2 Norwegian girdle calendars dated 1558: the Hegra Calendar in Trondheim, Det Kgl. Norske Videnskabers Selskabs Bibliotek, and the Oslo Calendar, cf. MS 1581. Layout and illustrations are nearly identical, but the two earlier calendars are rather crudely executed compared to the present one.

This Norwegian almanac is very interesting in that it was created in 1636, long after the establishment of printing throughout Europe.  It would be interesting to learn more about manuscript calender production in this period, and why this format might have been chosen over printed calenders in this region.

More examples from the Bodleian Library and UCLA:

Bodleian MS Rawl. D. 939

Bodleian MS Ashmole 8

Bodleian Canon. Liturg. 237

Bodleian MS Rawl. D. 28

UCLA MS Rosenbach 1004/29 – Two medical images – a bloodletting man and a urine wheel (used to diagnose based on the color and texture of a patient’s urine).

Statistical Outlier

Last night I started The Visual Display of Quantitative Information by Edward Tufte, which is excellent.  If you haven’t read it you may know it as the book featuring what I call the ‘Napoleon Graph‘, which Tufte calls the ‘best statistical graph ever drawn.’

But another graph featured in the book is even more interesting.  It’s a tenth, possibly eleventh-century, depiction of the movement of the planets across the zodiac over time, and comes from a commentary on astronomy.  The graph was included in an appendix added by an unknown transcriber of the main work.   It’s not accurate at all—among many problems is the fact that the horizontal axis of any one planet can’t be reconciled with the others—but it was probably intended as a simple schematic for teaching purposes.

What’s really unusual here is that the graph has no known predecessor, and seems to have sprung purely from the imagination of it’s creator.  Medieval writers and artists very rarely deviated from tradition.  Most images, whether of scientific, medical, fictional, or religious subjects, were part of traditional illustrative cycles that had existed since the late classical period.  There was some room for individual artists to maneuver within these tropes, but it was rare for something to appear completely out of the blue.

Not only is the graph unique, but it’s conceptually eight hundred years ahead of its time.  According to Tufte, time-series charts didn’t appear again until the late eighteenth century, when academics and designers began experimenting with a variety of quantitative displays.  And H. Gray Funkhouser, author of A Note on a Tenth Century Graph’ in Osiris (vol. 1, Jan 1936) notes that the use of grids was uncommon even into the 1850s.

You can read Funkhouser’s short piece on the graph here if you have access to JSTOR.  And here’s a larger image.

Memento Mori Part II

A few weeks ago I wrote about the evolution of anatomy illustrations, promising that the second part of the series would appear the following week.  If you’ve been waiting, I apologize, but I have a good excuse—Scientific American contacted me about doing a similar slideshow for their website, which has just gone live.  Very exciting!  There are ten images, a couple are based on my previous post, but most completely new: check it out.

Memento Mori Part I

Quid me mihi detrahis? Who is it that tears me from myself?     – Ovid, The Metamorphosis Book VI

I recently began an essay on the evolution of images in anatomy books between 1450 and 1800, and I thought I’d share some of my early research.  All the images I’ve used are from the National Library of Medicine, which has an excellent historical anatomy exhibit.  Clicking on the pictures below will take you to the appropriate section of the NLM website for more images, biographies, and bibliographies.  (And a word of warning, some might find the illustrations graphic, disturbing, or not safe for work.)  Part II will hopefully appear sometime next week.

Sources:

  • Books of the Body: Anatomical Ritual and Renaissance Learning by Andrea Carlino
  • The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture by Jonathan Sawday
  • The Art of Anatomy: Depicting the Body from the Renaissance to Today by Rifkin, Ackerman, and Folkenberg.

Although curiosity about the body has long been a feature of human culture, anatomical science stagnated during the Middle Ages, a time when the words of classical authorities were valued over discovery.  Rather than working from observation or experimentation, medieval scholars compiled, rewrote, and annotated older medical works, particularly those of Galen.  It wasn’t until the late Middle Ages and Renaissance that increasingly literate and intellectual segments of society, renewed interest in science and discovery, and advances in printing resulted in the production of new anatomical treatises that eclipsed the achievements of the past and led to the foundation of modern anatomy.  But these new volumes were not purely scientific or didactic.  Luxury texts intended for an erudite, upper-class audience beyond the medical profession, they mixed art, science, and religion to create dramatic meditations on the natures of flesh and soul and the meaning of the body’s short existence.

Fasciculus de medicina

The first printed anatomy book was published in Venice in 1492 by the Gregorio brothers.  A Latin translation of a work by a little known German physician named Johannes de Ketham, it was planted firmly in the medieval medical tradition.  The book, which included treatises on subjects such as bloodletting, urinoscopy, and dissection, became an important teaching text, but its sumptuous woodcuts were also geared toward an audience of wealthy intellectuals.  A major success, it was republished in 1493 with new illustrations showing contemporary medical scenes including a dissection, and it appeared in twelve editions within a decade.  Though produced by a workshop, the designs are good examples of the clean, classical style of Venetian Renaissance illustration.  Below is the traditional zodiac man as well as a dissection scene, which portrays an anatomy lesson as performed in the late Middle Ages.  The young lector reads from an anatomical text, most likely Galen, while the sector, an uneducated barber/surgeon, preforms the dissection, and the ostensor, a high ranking professor, translates the words of the lector and directs the sector.  At this time dissection was not an act of observation and discovery, but was a tightly controlled public ritual intended to reinforce the authority of classical medical texts.  The illustration indicates the importance of the text by the prominent placement of the lector relative to the other figures, including the higher ranking ostensor.

Isagogae breves

This book, published in 1522 and 1523 by the humanist physician Jacopo Berengario da Carpi, is credited as the first printed anatomy text based on direct observation of the body.  Berengario was deeply skeptical of traditional anatomical practice, saying that a good anatomist ‘does not believe anything in his discipline simply because of the spoken or written word: what is required here is sight and touch.’  Though the woodcuts are artistically and anatomically crude, part of their importance lies in their reflection of Italian Renaissance culture.  Berengario was an art collector, and many of the figures are based on rediscovered classical art, religious images, and important works by Leonardo, Michelangelo, and Raphael.  Berengario recognized the importance of anatomical knowledge for artists, and he recommended his book for their use as well as that of medical students.  The half-flayed figure below is in the traditional pose of an Apollo with light rays.  Other illustrations represent the redemptive potential of dissection, which was believed to help atone for the sins of the criminals whose bodies were commonly used for this purpose.  Several images of partially draped female nudes indicate a tension between sexual modesty and the display of dissected reproductive organs.

De humani corporis fabrica

One of the most famous medical texts of all time, The Fabric of the Human Body (1543) by Andreas Vesalius, was the first truly modern anatomical book.  Vesalius was a Flemish surgeon of the University of Padua who had been trained in the Galenic tradition.  Based on his own experience with dissection he rejected Galen as the ultimate authority and argued that surgeons should make their own observations, and he corrected many Galenic mistakes, such as the multi-lobed liver, that had been passed from text to text through the Middle Ages.  Vesalius and his collaborators were also some of the first people to grasp the full potential of the printed book, using the title page, illustrations, initials, and chapter/paragraph subdivisions to create a harmonious and practical work.  Vesalius’s illustrations were most likely based on his own careful drawings, and he worked closely with the woodcut artist Jan Stefan van Kalkar, a member of Titian’s studio.  This partnership resulted in extremely accurate and detailed work, better than anything that proceeded it.  But these are not just sterile medical images—the cadavers display human emotions of sadness, despair, and mourning.  The skeleton below ponders mortality in a memento mori which would reappear throughout western culture, including in Shakespeare.  The second appears to pray, or to be bent in agony.  Throughout the book dead trees and barren landscapes, representing death, are contrasted with churches and the promise of eternal life.

De dissectione partium corporis humani

Charles Estienne, a member of the famous printing family of Paris, began work on this book during the 1530s, hoping it would replace the Isagogae breves of Berengario.  He had been a student in Paris at the same time as Vesalius, sharing the former’s interest in dissection and the belief that direct observation was more important than the words of authorities.  Unfortunately, while Estienne’s book contributed some new discoveries to the science of anatomy, it was plagued by legal issues regarding the artwork and was not published until two years after De humani corporis fabrica.  One of the interesting aspects of Estienne’s book is that it includes a number of woodcuts of nude women that were, according to Rifkin, originally intended as ‘genteel humanist erotica’, but were altered by partial dissection and the inclusion of anatomical information relating to reproductive anatomy.  Included are Bathsheba being spied upon by David (below), as well as the goddesses Venus, Antiope, and Proserpina.  A good example of the complex relationships between art, medicine, books, and sex during the early modern era.

Making Visible Embryos

The Cambridge University Department of the History and Philosophy of Science has created an absolutely wonderful online exhibition called Making Visible Embryos.  It looks at changing perceptions and imagery regarding human prenatal development from the late Middle Ages to the present, and includes illustrations from a number of interesting, early modern printed works.  The exhibit is extensive – make sure you go through both layers of tabs to get all the good stuff.